Killer whales in Iceland and Shetland share some call types but differ from those from Norway
- Icelandic Orca Project

- Mar 11, 2021
- 3 min read
Our recent acoustic study suggests that killer whales in Iceland and Norway may not have been one completely mixed population as previously thought. We found that, while the basic properties of Icelandic and Norwegian killer whale calls are similar, they do not share any call types.
Killer whales in Iceland and Norway are very similar in their genetics, morphology and behaviour. They mostly feed on herring and use similar techniques to capture this prey. Before the 1960s, the Norwegian herring stock was distributed all across between Norway the East shores of Iceland. Catches from whalers and sighting information indicated that killer whales were distributed uniformly in this region, suggesting one population spread out between Iceland and Norway. However, more recent studies using photo-identification could not match any individuals between Iceland and Norway. Therefore, it was thought that the collapse of the herring stocks in the 1960s lead to a split in the population, with the whales retreating closer to the coastal areas of Iceland and Norway, where there was still herring to be found.

Recording killer whales in Iceland
We compared acoustic recordings of killer whales collected in Iceland, Norway and Shetland between 2005 and 2016 to see if the whales in these locations share any calls. The idea was that if the whales that we see in these locations were all a single, mixed population in such a recent past we might expect to see some calls that are the same. In other well-studied killer whale populations, such as the North Pacific residents for example, call repertoires reflect relatedness, with closely related whales sharing more calls than distantly related ones. From these studies we also know that call repertoires in wild killer whales only change very slowly.

Processing calls in the lab
The first step in comparing call repertoires is to collate catalogues of the calls recorded in different locations. For Iceland, only a small catalogue from the 1980s existed. From our collection of over 700 hours of recordings from Iceland, Norway and Shetland, we extracted over 12.000 high quality calls. We used these calls to create a call catalogue for Iceland and updated existing catalogues from Norway.
Once the call catalogues were established, we compared the calls from each location and found that while they share similar basic properties of duration and frequency, killer whales from Iceland and Shetland share a few call types but whales from Norway do not appear to share any call types with the others.
Visual representation and corresponding sounds from a recording of killer whale calls from Iceland.
Visual representation and corresponding sounds from a recording of killer whale calls from Norway.
These findings are similar to what we know from the most recent photo-identification studies. There have not been any matches of individuals between Iceland and Norway or Shetland and Norway. However, there are several individuals that regularly migrate between Iceland and Shetland.
This analysis was the first step in answering the question of how call repertoires vary across the North Atlantic and within different groups or regions. We are already working on new projects trying to learn more about the vocal behaviour of killer whales in Iceland. For example, we are looking at variation in the repertoire between locations in Iceland as well as between different groups of individuals. Understanting how killer whales in different locations are (and used to be) connected is important to assess the status of this top predator in the North Atlantic.
Like most of the work we do, this study was a great team effort with wonderful support from our international collaborators: Selbmann A, Deecke VD, Fedutin ID, Filatova OA, Miller PJO, Svavarsson J and Samarra, FIP (2020) A comparison of Northeast Atlantic killer whale (Orcinus orca) stereotyped call repertoires. Marine Mammal Science, doi: 10.1111/mms.12750 Available here or contact us for a pdf





rr 88 dạo này mình lướt thấy vài người nhắc nên tò mò bấm vào thử xem giao diện thế nào thôi. Mình không có ngồi soi nội dung hay chơi gì cả, chủ yếu xem họ sắp xếp trang có dễ nhìn không. Ấn tượng đầu là bố cục khá thoáng, các mục được gom theo nhóm nhìn phát hiểu ngay, không bị nhồi chữ. Mình thích kiểu họ để menu ở chỗ dễ thấy nên chuyển qua lại giữa các phần khá nhanh, không phải mò lâu. Mấy khung thông tin hiển thị theo dạng cột gọn gàng nên lướt trên điện thoại cũng đỡ rối mắt. Nói chung cảm giác dùng thử vài phút thấy ổn vì…
The way this topic was explained made it simple to understand. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and insights with readers.
mumbai.neverendservice
trang chủ 789bet hôm trước mình lướt thử vì thấy mấy đứa bạn hay nhắc, kiểu tò mò xem giao diện ra sao thôi chứ không định ngồi đọc kỹ. Vừa vào cái là thấy trang sắp xếp khá gọn, nhìn không bị rối mắt, các phần nội dung chia thành từng khối nên mình liếc một vòng là hiểu đại khái đang ở đâu. Mình thích nhất là thanh menu đặt chỗ dễ thấy, bấm qua lại mấy mục nhanh, không phải mò nhiều. Chữ với khoảng trắng cũng vừa phải nên cảm giác “thoáng” hơn mấy trang hay nhồi thông tin. Nói chung lướt vài phút là quen cách họ trình bày, nhất là phần menu điều hướng…